|
|
Transcript: Charlene Li - Forrester Below is a transcript of a podcast that my colleague, Jim
Storer, and I did with Forrester VP/analyst, Charlene Li. What's cool is that it
was done in a limo coming from the airport to the Red Rock Hotel. To listen to
the podcast, head on over to Jim's blog.
TRANSCRIPT You’re
listening to one in a series of conversations from the 2008 Community 2.0
Conference in Las Vegas.
Aaron Strout: This is Aaron Strout. I’m
with Mzinga. And
I’m here with Jim
Storer, my colleague. And we are interviewing Charlene
Li, who is a vice president of Forrester Research. We just picked Charlene up at the airport,
so you can tell we are dedicated to the podcast. Welcome, Charlene.Charlene Li:Thank you for
picking me up, guys.
Aaron Strout: Our pleasure.
So, we’re doing a podcast for the Community 2.0 Conference and Charlene is one of the keynotes
tomorrow. And so, we have a few questions we want to ask, and the first one –
which is a series of questions we’re going to ask a number of folks tomorrow –
is: What’s the elevator pitch? What do you do? Give us a little background on
yourself, including some of your media-based background.
Charlene Li: Sure. I’m an
analyst at Forrester Research. And I just wrote a book called Groundswell, and I’m going to be talking about some of the
key ideas and frameworks inside the book. And the key theme that I’m very
excited about is this is a book that we've been trying to write for
well, we have written. And I've been working on
the topic for about five years now. And even before that, I came from newspapers
– just to talk about the media background.
Aaron Strout: Yes.
Charlene Li: And when I
was there, it was a Community Newspaper Company. It was a Fidelity subsidiary in
Boston – about a million circulation, 200 different newspapers. And my job was
to put all of those newspapers online. And so, one of the things I decided to do
was instead of putting the newspapers, we decided to put up the communities,
each of the individual towns, neighborhoods, organizations. And one
of the things that I was most proud about was that we put out journalism in a
different way.
So we said, “Let’s have the communities actually do the
publishing.” So it was citizen journalism way back in 1996 using a platform
called Koz – K-O-Z-A-N – I don’t know if people remember that. And so, it was a
way to really explore the use of these technologies, to give people a voice. It
was just too early for that; people didn’t have digital cameras, was on dial-up. So, it
was great to be able to just follow this space – sort of put it on the shelf for
a while, let the technology develop. And then about 2002-2003, blogging was
starting to take off, social networking was starting to take off. So it’s an
opportunity to come back to my roots in journalism and community
activism.
Aaron Strout: So what got
you inspired to sort of reengage with – I’ll say Community 2.0? I mean it’s sort
of fitting in terms of we’re going to the conference. You dealt with Community
1.0 with a community newspaper. The blogging and all that came around again. So
were you already at Forrester, and you were starting to
study these things? Or what sparked that interest?
Charlene Li: Yeah, I was
already at Foreste,r and I came to Forrester in ’99,
right at the peak of Web 1.0. I was the person doing the online advertising
sizing forecasts that most people put into their pitches to VCs. And it was
interesting to see what the reporters were doing, but I just thought that was
going to be a lot more.
And I
remember Tim Berners-Lee talking about his vision for the Web way back in 1993:
“This is not an opportunity for companies to talk to each other; it’s for people
to talk to each other.” And that was never fulfilled back in ’99-2000. It was
just this missing piece, which is the people part.
Another
colleague of mine, Marianne Modell,
used to say that “the Internet felt like a neutron bomb went off.” All the
buildings were there, but where were the people? And I think the fact that these
technologies started getting a lot easier – that people could get these tools
into their hands and get power from that – really started changing the dynamic
about 2003-2004.
Aaron Strout: Now, do you
think this is here to stay? I know there are some people that are excited about
the movement. There are some people that are skeptical that this is just a flash
in the pan.
Charlene Li: Oh, it’s
absolutely here to stay, and it’s just gonna get even crazier, absolutely
crazier. Because whenever people can get together -- whenever we have more than
two people in a room, there’s politics involved. You know, three’s a crowd?
And I
think it’s just so fascinating to see what happens when you throw a social
dynamic on top of anything. And if it’s anything that we’ve seen in the past
week – announcements by MySpace, Facebook and today Google. For [inaudible]
connect, it’s pretty astounding what the potential is going to be, but we’re
just beginning to see the tip of the iceberg here.
Aaron Strout: So you
mentioned your book, Groundswell, that you and your colleague,
Josh Bernoff, wrote – among many of the other folks at Forrester, I think – helped you collaborate. Can you talk a
little bit about what the book really stands for and some of the lessons that it
talks about? I just got finished reading it myself and really enjoyed it quite a
bit.
Charlene Li: Well, thank
you for reading it. In talking about the space to a lot of companies, we kept
coming across one very specific thing, and that was it’s really confusing. It
feels like a totally different, foreign world.
And so,
we felt there was a need to put it into one place: all the frameworks, the
processes, the ideas, the data, the case studies, the metrics. Put it in one
place as sort of a recipe book on how to deal with this new space, because it’s
very strange, very confusing. The rules are completely different. I often times
feel like I’m explaining this alien world over there that people are a little
bit scared and are watching it from a distance and a little bit afraid to go
visit.
Aaron Strout: Great. Now,
Jim, I know you’ve got a question about online advertising.
Jim Storer: Right. It’s
interesting, you brought up online advertising, and I’m just wondering: A lot of
the Web 2.0 companies -- the applications that are out there right now, seems
like they're banking on online advertising being their business model. And I
wonder if you think that’s going to come to fruition or if not, what do you
think is really going to come to their rescue?
Charlene Li: I think it’s
definitely online advertising, because the other parts are consumer payments,
subscriptions. I just don’t see that happening. There are just so many choices
and options that unless you're providing a tremendous amount of value
– unique value and tremendous lock-in – it’s
really hard to get payments from people. So it has to be online advertising,
basically a business overhead. I think the biggest problem is that today’s
online advertising just isn’t very good.
Jim Storer: Right. And
there are companies that are trying to really target the advertisements;
certainly, Facebook’s done a lot in that area. Do you think that’s going to pan
out and more and more companies will –
Charlene Li: I think it
will. I think it definitely well. Because the one thing advertisers love is
attention. And if you can show that you're influencing decisions, then by all
means you have a business there. And I think there's something really
interesting here. It’s going to be much more indirect.
Whereas
advertising in the past, you had the captive attention of somebody, in this
space, it’s not so much captive as it is influence through your friends. So if
your friends are a big influence and you were influenced through them, then that
has an interesting sort of downstream impact. And so, advertising’s still very
confused about how do you actually tap into somebody’s influence and use that as
something that you want to actually target, and not just somebody’s
demographic.
Jim Storer: So I’m only
halfway through the book at this point, but I’ve been reading it as well. And
one of the case studies you brought up is Twitter. And it seems like you
brought it in maybe at the tail end of when you were writing the book as one of
the cases. If you were writing the book today, how would you change what you
wrote in the book? Or what would you say today about it?
Charlene Li: Yeah, we
used Twitter as an example of a new technology, and there's a lot of questions
still whether Twitter matters or not. And it was interesting. When I was writing
that chapter with Josh, we were facing this whole sort of Twitter RIP in 2007
kind of phenomenon. So we put in place a sort of technology checklist in terms
of, “How can you tell whether something’s worth paying attention to?”
So I
wouldn’t change that much in terms of that technology chapter, because we wrote
that chapter more or less to give a snapshot of what the technologies are in
place today, but also to take into account all the new technologies that could
come out of the pike. And the most important thing is to look at these new
technologies and say, “Does it change your relationship? Does it fundamentally
change relationships between people?”
There
were a lot of other things, but Twitter definitely does that. It changes how
much I communicate with people, how often I do it, the kind of asynchronous,
synchronous behavior that’s there. And also, what I love about Twitter is that
it’s very open and it’s plugged into so many different aspects wherever I want
to use it as a communication tool and platform. So, I think that is a platform
that’s here to stay for a while.
Jim Storer: So, I’ve
got another question just about companies that are thinking about getting
started here. And I know a lot of Groundswell is about
companies just getting started and thinking about how they can apply community
or social media to different business processes. So, if you just speak a couple
of minutes about that, that would be great.
Charlene Li: Yeah, I
think the biggest thing I would say to companies is to start small. I mean the
one thing that we saw in every single case study that we did is that they really
needed to -- because it’s so different; it’s so hard to take on a huge project
and put out a full-fledged program right from the very beginning. It’s going to
be nearly impossible.
Now, it
doesn’t mean that you can't think big. You need to think about where you're
going to take these relationships with people, but it’s important to start
small, try small tests, and then quickly iterate on top of that. So, it’s don’t
be afraid to get out there. There’s absolutely no reason [not] to get out there
and just get your feet dirty, especially if you keep the stakes really light and
small.
Aaron Strout: So, I have
one final question and it’s a little bit of a wild-card question. George Colony put out
a piece last year. It was a fairly simple, straightforward -- I’ll say it was
almost like an open letter that talked about some of the things that he believed
in and he espoused. And that was sort of freeing digital bits, and the fact that
CEOs really needed to embrace this overall phenomenon that’s happening.
Do you
feel, looking at Forrester, that they really have embraced it? I certainly have
seen it in some of the analysts that I follow, like yourself, and Josh, and
Jeremiah. Are they getting it? Are they doing it fast enough? And will they sort
of become this thing that Groundswell is espousing sometime in
the next few years?
Charlene Li: Yeah, I
had an interesting talk with George and he says, “I’m so frustrated. I wish I
could move faster.” And then he said, “But reading the book, I realized that I
had to be patient.” So, these things take time. Often times what you find is the
CEO gets it and wants really an organization at light speed. And people at the
ground level -- the groundswell, literally – get it and they want to use the
tools.
And the
people in the middle are the ones who are extremely threatened by the new order,
and so they need to be sort of brought along carefully and slowing along the
way. It’s really hard, I think, to completely transform the organization
overnight, because we are talking about a wholesale transformation about the way
organizations work.
So at
Forrester, it is hard. It is really hard. And George is blogging it. And he has
this wonderful post about why it’s so hard to be a CEO blogger. And he’s
confused. He goes, “Nobody’s paying attention to me.” You know, just really
personal things that every CEO kind of goes through but he’s actually talking
about.
And we
as an organization have growing pains just like any other ones – about how much
control to give up, how much control to keep, putting blogging policies in
place, when can you blog, when can you not, how do you participate in discussion
groups? It goes on and on. Every organization deals with this.
Aaron Strout: Now, one
final question. You guys seem to be at the forefront of this movement. If you
had advice that you could give to other analyst companies, what would you say?
How do they begin this journey, and what are some of the pitfalls that they look
out for?
Charlene Li: For
analyst companies specifically?
Aaron Strout: Because I
think this is a hard thing. I mean, analysts want to keep things in. It’s really
sort of the belief, traditionally, has been, “Keep it in a walled garden and let
people pay for it.” You guys are breaking that model to a degree, and I think a
lot of analyst companies get scared by this concept because it really is turning
the model on its head.
Charlene Li: I had
built so much business through being open and transparent. And the more
– what astounds me is that the more open and
transparent I am, the more business comes in. So I will put out a report
– I did a report on ROI of blogging; I wasn’t getting anywhere. And every analyst
knows what this feels like. You're doing the research and you just hit a wall.
There's just nothing else that you can come up with. The research is dry. The
interviews are flat. It’s just, “blah.”
So, we
threw everything up on the blog. We organized it; we put out the frameworks; and
put it out there for the community to give comment on. And people are like,
“This is great stuff.” We’re like, “Wait, it’s not done.” And we got a huge
amount of feedback. And I’m like, “I’m never going to write a report inside of
my wall garden ever again.”
So, I
keep thinking that this is an opportunity to really be closer to our clients, be
closer to the industry, and really understand what's going on out there. You get
better at being an analyst, I think, by being open and transparent. And because
you're better, more people will want you. And because you produce better
research, and that in the end is what draws clients in.
Aaron Strout: Well, it’s great, and you
know we’re one of your clients and it’s one of the reasons why we actually were
attracted to you guys, was the openness that folks like yourself, and Josh, and
Jeremiah, and Peter brought to the table. So thank you for spending this time
with us. I’m here with Jim Storer. This is Aaron Strout. We have Charlene Li of
Forrester Research. Appreciate it.
Jim Storer: If somebody
wants to learn more about Groundswell, where do they
go?
Charlene Li: Thank you
for that. They go to Groundswell.Forrester.com.
Jim Storer: Fantastic.
Thank you.
Charlene Li: Thanks.
Outro: For more conversations from the 2008
Community 2.0 Conference, visit iirusa.com/community and WeAreSmarter.org.
Fri, May 30 2008
|