|
|
Transcript: Alph Bingham - InnoCentive
Aaron Strout:
We are fortunate to have a well-known guest today, Alph Bingham. He is a board member, founder and former CEO
of InnoCentive, which is really a pioneer in the collaborative community,
crowd-sourcing space. So, welcome
Alph. We really appreciate you joining
us today.
Alph Bingham:
Thanks Aaron. Really glad to be
here.
Aaron Strout:
So, Alph, let's just jump right in, and one of the things I like to do
with a guest is have them give a little bit of background. So, I think I've read a little bit of
it. It's fascinating. Talk to us about how you came to where you
are today as the board member and how you founded InnoCentive, which really is
a fascinating story.
Alph Bingham:
Well, the fairly short version is that I joined Eli Lilly out of graduate
school as a bench chemist and spent almost 30 years with them. The last few years I held two or three
assignments that I think are germane to InnoCentive, one is I was Vice
president of R&D strategy. I was
also a VP of a business incubation unit called eLilly there. And I was Vice President of sourcing
innovation, which consisted of corporate business development, research
acquisitions. It was the opposite of
alliance management. It was really the
outward-looking organization bringing technology in from the outside.
As part of that business incubator we launched several companies. We built an equity fund that allowed us to
invest and hold board seats, take a front row seat at some of the
transformation that was going on. But it
was part of a brainstorming session. The
other patent holder, if you will, because it was a business process patent for
InnoCentive on this, is Aaron Schacht. Then the
real work of launching InnoCentive fell to a member of the eLilly incubation
team by the name of Darren Carroll, who was the CEO when we first
launched and created InnoCentive. So,
it's really sort of the co-founding efforts: Aaron and I conceptually, Darren
bringing the final business model and organization together to create it. That's how InnoCentive came into being.
Aaron Strout:
So, following up on that question, I'm still amazed. You are featured heavily in our We Are
Smarter book, InnoCentive is. Now,
it was created back in 2001, if I'm not mistaken, out of eLilly – the division
of Eli Lilly. Now, this concept of
crowdsourcing really almost didn’t exist back then, and I know that was an
active time in the whole internet space, but how were you able to get traction
around this? I know you sort of talked
about having this sort of incubation lab, but you came up with the idea. How did you guys get that sold to management
to say, "You know what guys? This
crowdsourcing concept is going to work"?
Alph Bingham:
Well, the term crowdsourcing was even pre-infancy. I don't know for sure, but I'm pretty sure
that it was coined by Jeff Howe, a Wired article, back in mid-2006, and
it's a term that's gotten some legs since then.
Of course, the notion of open innovation predated some of that. There'd been good work by people like Hank
Chesbrough at Berkley really organizing these
notions, Gene Slowinski at Rutgers. There were some others who were publishing in
that area.
I would say if I really ask what the thought origins were and I think back to
the conversations with Aaron, the brainstorming sessions that were actually led
by a member of our IT function at Lilly, Murray Bodick, but the brainstorming that we did
and bounced around at that time we were looking at some precursors like the
open source software movement, which, as you know, didn’t have a strong
monetization model behind it and definitely had some different attitudes then
we built our company around intellectual property.
Those are the kinds of things that were out in the environment in the day in
2001 when this was constructed. At the
time, getting traction from management was a considerable amount of internal marketing. There wasn't a lot to point to. There weren't a lot of precedents. There certainly were no precedents in the
space that we eventually launched into.
But we had some commitments from leadership all the way up to the Chairman's
office. Sidney Taurel was the chairman
at the time, to really seriously explore the way the internet transformed the
fundamentals of business, and he was committed to backing some of the concepts
that we developed.
Aaron Strout:
Well, it's amazing that you guys were able to do that, so thank you for
the clarification on crowdsourcing.
Interestingly enough, we actually did a webinar last week on
crowdsourcing, and I was fortunate enough to have Jeff as one of the guest
speakers. You're right; the term itself
was created in 2006 as a result of his Wired Magazine article. In fact, I
just found out – and I hope I'm not breaking news here – that Jeff is actually
working on a book on crowdsourcing. So,
my guess is you guys may find your way into that if they haven't reached out to
you guys already.
Talk a little bit about how your model has evolved, because it's changed
dramatically I think from when you first launched where you're much more
internally focused to the point where you were spun off I believe a year or so
ago. What made you – or how did that
decision come about to become a separate entity from Eli Lilly?
Alph Bingham:
You're right. The business has
undergone several transformations, several stages of evolution. One of those that is significant is the one
that occurred at the end of 2005. Prior
to that we were a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and managed internally in
the sense that we did have external customers.
So, even as we were an entirely Lilly-owned entity, we had customers
like Dow and Procter & Gamble and others.
So, we were reaching out.
But the decision to spin it out was probably prompted by the fact that having
attracted these other customers and it still being a business that was
incubated and was in startup mode and everything else Lilly said, "Why not
share some of the creation burden or the risk associated with a new business
and everything else with the marketplace as a whole since it's obviously
evolving to serve more than just internal R&D needs?" That was some of the rationale that went into
the spinning out process that occurred in December of '05.
Aaron Strout:
Now, you mentioned the fact that you work with some big companies, and
Procter & Gamble I think is a good example.
They are mentioned in our book as well.
How do you convince some of these old world companies to take the leap
of faith and start using your sense of matchmaking, your digital matchmaking or
external community to do their innovation?
Is that difficult to do? I would
think it would be. What's the one big
point that you make to get them over that hurdle?
Alph Bingham:
Well, it was very difficult to do in 2001. It's easier in 2007, but there are still
hurdles there. Make no mistake about
it. It's a different way of thinking,
and it's a different role that's played in this innovation process by the
internal staff than one they've historically played. At some of the early adopter companies the
key to that was a visionary in their management structure. For example, a Dan Kiddle at Dow who was our third
customer, and Procter & Gamble, as you mentioned, was our second, and that
was Larry Houston, who was really inventing a lot of the connect and develop
strategy which I'm sure you've read about in several places and which figures
in the book.
Aaron Strout:
Yep.
Alph Bingham:
So, I would say visionary was the key in those early days, but
increasingly, we're able to reach right into the organizations themselves. They're becoming more familiar with
crowdsourcing, the way the system works.
They're definitely starting to look at open innovation, build outreach
groups. A lot of the companies that are
our customers have dedicated innovation centers in that they've got groups that
are looking for new ways to innovate.
Aaron Strout:
So, to that end, one of the things that we like to do as part of our
innovation process and part of the overall We Are Smarter project is we're
always in the hunt for ways that companies can be more innovative. One of the things that I try to do in these
podcasts is ask very smart people like yourself that have been there, done that,
any thoughts on best practices for a company that is just getting started with
their community endeavors or their social media endeavors? It sounds like you've had to have some of
those conversations with folks like Dell and Procter & Gamble.
Alph Bingham:
Well, there are a lot of best practices, one I kind of made reference to
already, which is that there's a change in the role of the internal R&D
staff. They probably have a self-imposed
as well as organizationally-imposed identity, which is them as problem solver. In this case, the problem solving is actually
taken to the external world, and they become question askers and challenge
formulators and solution finders. That's
a different role, and sometimes part of effective implementation is to talk
through that and make sure that the rewards and the recognition systems can
align themselves with that and not only with the more traditional roles that
the scientists, engineers and technologists play in these companies.
That'd be the sort of thing I'd be advising a large client on, perhaps somebody
who was moving into community space either as a large company or as a small
intermediary, not necessarily a competitor of ours. I might not be giving them any advice at all,
but somebody who might be in a similar spirit looking to build community
resources that are going to do real work on their behalf is trust. It’s probably a more important currency than
cash when it comes to building the community, retaining the community and
getting the community to make commitments and follow through on those
commitments. It was an open question in
2001. Why would anybody go at risk to
solve a problem that belonged to someone else?
Then we weren't sure we knew the answer to those questions, and we weren't
sure we knew how to find out the answer to those questions other than launching
it and doing it.
Aaron Strout:
Well, we as the collective community and social media space do applaud
you guys and thank you for paving the way because, certainly, like you said,
you are way, way ahead of your time in 2001, and it's good to see you guys have
succeeded in spades and really brought a lot of innovation to the space through
the use of external audiences or crowdsourcing, as we now call it. One follow-up question –
Alph Bingham:
Let me interrupt and just tell you thanks. I appreciate that. I also recognize that we're going to look
back on this a decade or two from now and realize what baby steps we were all
taking. I think this thing is just at
the very beginning.
Aaron Strout:
That's absolutely true. Just as a
sidebar, I talked to a number of people who say in a way this is like search
marketing. Although I think this is
probably a thousand times bigger when it really blooms, but you remember five
or seven years ago when people were just starting to poke around with search
engine marketing and paid keyword search and things like that and no one really
knew much about it, and now it's a multibillion-dollar industry, and I think
really community and this outsourcing-crowdsourcing collaboration is going to
be a trillion-dollar industry. It's just going to be huge over the next 10, 20,
30 years.
So, the final question is – and I was actually going to ask you about who you
read for blogs, but you gave me a little bit of insight up front in our
pre-call conversation. You said you
recently started blogging. I'd love to
know what goes through your head. What
are you finding, what are you learning as you're blogging, and I imagine you're
a fairly busy guy. How do you find time
to actually blog for InnoCentive?
Alph Bingham:
Well, you know, you make time. You
rarely find time. So, some of it is just
discipline. We're so early on this it's
just the very beginning, and I hope I can answer that question with much more
insight in five or six months. Between
the practices that we've seen I don't think it's a lack of material. At least I don't see any lack of material for
the next 20 or 30 because I think about the insights that we've gained as we've
gone through this learning process, the way in which the internet really does
have the ability to fundamentally transform innovation, the notions of
collective intelligence that we've discussed with Tom Malone at MIT and
others. Yet so few places where this is
written down.
So, in some ways I view it not as an assignment but as an opportunity to
codify, and I find that when I go to the effort of putting something in writing
nothing does more to sharpen my own thought process on the topic than
that. So, that's the experiment we very,
very recently embarked on.
Aaron Strout:
Well, it's helpful to know, and I've been at it now for about a year and
a half myself, and I absolutely agree with you.
You have to make time for it, and it does have a way of sort of
codifying and happening ideas in your mind.
So, best of luck with that. I
look forward to reading some of your blogs, and maybe we'll revisit this in
five or six months and we can check in on your progress.
Alph Bingham:
And I look forward to learning from you on your experiences as well.
Aaron Strout:
Well, I appreciate that. So, to
that end, thank you, everyone, for listening in today. Thank you, Alph, for taking the time to join
us. This was fascinating, and we really
appreciate you spending some time to be able to talk about the journey that
you've had within InnoCentive, starting off with Eli Lilly and the lessons
you've learned. Things like this are
really quite valuable to our audience, so really appreciate you taking the
time.
Alph Bingham:
Great. Thanks, Aaron.
Aaron Strout:
We appreciate you listening in to this series of the WeShow
podcasts. To find other podcasts like
this you can check out WeAreSmarter.org, Mzinga.com and also iTunes under
"We Are Smarter." Thanks so
much for joining us. We look forward to
seeing you next week.
Fri, Dec 07 2007
|