|
|
Transcript: Jasmine Antonick - Cambrian
Aaron Strout:
Hi, my name is Aaron Strout. Welcome to the We Show.
[music]
Aaron Strout:
Thank you for joining us on the We Show today. My name is Aaron Strout, and I’m the VP of marketing for Mzinga, a leading provider of workplace and customer community solutions. This podcast is one in a series and can be found on the WeAreSmarter.org site, Mzinga.com, and iTunes under "We Are Smarter."
And of course, we do appreciate your comments. You're welcome to dial me at (781) 328-2824, or e-mail me: aaron@mzinga.com.
Our guest today is Jasmine Antonick, who
is the VP of communications at Cambrian
House. Welcome, Jasmine.
Jasmine Antonick:
Thank you.
Aaron Strout: Today I’d like to just dig down a little bit
more. You guys were mentioned as really
fairly prominently, I think, in the book in the first chapter of We
Are Smarter Than Me, which will be coming out, as I mentioned. One of the reasons why you got mentioned, I
think, is because of your tagline, which I loved. It’s “the Home of Crowdsourcing,” so Cambrian
House, Home of Crowdsourcing, a term I think that you mentioned was coined by
Jeff Howe of Wired magazine. Tell
us a little bit about Cambrian House and what your role is, and how you guys
got started, Jasmine, if you don’t mind?
Jasmine Antonick:
Sure. Kind of as you and I were talking about
beforehand, is, I think, the interesting thing and amazing thing about online
communities or people that work with crowds is that we’re constantly
evolving. It was an exciting experienced
to be involved in the We
Are Smarter Than Me book project, because we just knew it would be a
work in progress and that it’d be ongoing.
I love the fact that we’re doing podcasts and allowing people to kind of
comment, and continue to submit.
With Cambrian House, we started back – we incorporated in 2005, but we
didn’t do anything until the early part of 2006, so probably that. The term “crowdsourcing” hadn’t been coined
by Jeff Howe yet, but we kind of had a feeling that online communities were
taking shape and that people were getting involved in products and development,
and giving companies and organizations more feedback.
People are getting more freedom to communicate and express themselves online,
and be involved in things they loved, whether or not it’s entertainment or
products, etc. We had a feeling, because
a lot of us came from software backgrounds, thinking if you have a software
company, more often than not you get a couple developers around a table, you
develop a product that you love, you create an inventory of software and then
think, “We’re going to magically release this to the public and they’re going
to love it and they’re going to eat it up.
Well, more often than not, you end up creating inventory that no one
needs, wants, or loves. So what we felt
is that with people becoming more and more engaged online, with the success of
Wikipedia, which was even quite rampant around 2005 to 2006, is kind of
[inaudible] that people are becoming more prosumers, and that people are
actually passionate and excited about things, whether or not they’re involved
in software or marketing, or research and development in their 9-to-5 job.
When they come home and they get involved online, they’re opinionated, they’re
excited, they’re passionate. So we felt,
“What if we create a home called Cambrian House and basically kind of define it
as software evolution: Involve the crowd in coming up with software ideas,
determining the best ideas through a voting process. Then we would work with them to actually
build it and market it. So the cool
thing was we weren’t just an open-source community. We actually involved a royalty point system,
because we felt, “If people are involved, then they should actually get a piece
of the pie, and let’s create a commercial community where people get involved
and get a piece of the pie through a royalty point system.” So if the product becomes successful, they get
a cut of the net profit. Unlike in the
open-source world, where more often than not people do it because they’re
passionate.
A couple months after we launched the website, Jeff Howe came up with the term “crowdsourcing,”
and it was like a light bulb went off.
We are the Home of Crowdsourcing.
We started off, of course, with software, but we’ve evolved beyond
that. In fact, when you think of crowdsourcing
in its simplest terms – and this isn’t a Jeff Howe definition, but definitely
the way the Cambrian House looks at it – is one, create a crowd; and two,
source it for wisdom and participation.
Because the more diverse your crowd is and the bigger it is, the more
wisdom you get out of them and the more feedback they’re willing to give.
Whether or not you’re looking for T-shirt designs, like Threadless does, if you’re looking for
R&D solutions like InnoCentive
does, or you’re looking for software business ideas, like Cambrian House does.
So, that’s where we started, and we’ve used a variety of ways to tap the
community for wisdom, with IdeaWarz, which
is our idea tournament, that a lot of people vote and comment on ideas. As a matter of fact, what happens is after
people give their feedback, an idea submitter gets to polish their idea and
make it more and more brilliant before they ever start building it. So when you open up your – when you kind of
open up the Kimono, per se, for crowd feedback, you’re often doing something
better than the typical entrepreneurial stealth mode model that a lot of us get
into when we first try and start a business or have an idea. [It] is, “Oh,
heaven forbid I tell anyone because someone will steal my idea.” Well, no, the
fact is, as soon as you start telling people, you get some pretty valuable
feedback that makes your idea more meaningful, more likely to resonate with
consumers. So, that’s what we’ve done.
Aaron Strout:
Yeah, and I would have to think
that you get cheerleaders out of that, right?
You have a very significant number of members – 35,000 – up from the
30,000 quoted in the book. So, to your point, you not only can get some
feedback on your ideas, but I would have to think that the rest of the members
of the community are rooting for you.
You know, as they go, so goes the product, so goes their success as
well.
Jasmine Antonick:
Yeah. If you think of it outside the online
community ecosystem, and you put yourself at a coffee shop with a friend that
introduces you to a colleague of theirs and says, “This person has an idea that
I think you might like.” If you love the
idea, it gets inside your cell, and you want to work with that person. You want
to join their board, you want to support them, you want to connect them with
your contacts. You want to rally behind
this person and this idea.
The same thing happens online.
If you meet a person online, you always have to go through concentric
levels and trust with them, interact with them, message with them, get involved
with their blogs, send them instant messages, get to know this person. But beyond that, if you love an idea, you’re going
to get to know that person.
I’ll give you a good example of what happens.
We have a community of over 35,000 people now. They’re not all software developers. It’s a really diverse community, because
truly it’s like the YouTube of ideas.
We’re a community where it’s like a repository of ideas. The community rallies behind it. They help define the best ones. You don’t have to win an idea tournament to
actually have an idea move forward. A
really good example is a community member submitting an idea called “Last.fm.” He had created an actual device that would
allow you to tap into Last.fm – which
everyone knows right now, based out of the U.K. – and get it on your mobile
phone. So, it was taking Last.fm mobile, and he called it “Last.fm.” He’s like, “I’ve totally got a working prototype.” Now this guy, his 9-to-5 job was a
courier. He drove around and delivered
packages to companies, but what he was passionate about was mobile devices and
actually creating applications for them, so in his spare time he created this.
Now, he had no business savvy. The
awesome thing is he joined Cambrian House.
A fellow by the name of Paul, who’s handling the community of Fish99, stumbled across
it. He’s been involved in the mobile space
for a long time, including mobile games, and says, “On my LinkedIn profile, I’m
two degrees separation of the CEO of Last.fm. Why don’t I see if I can set you
up with a meeting?” [He] set up the
meeting, helped this other guy create a more proper CV, create a LinkedIn
profile, clean up his Cambrian House profile as well, so he came off more as an
entrepreneur rather than a courier. You
know, if you’re passionate about it, you are an entrepreneur. You don’t need to go to school and have a
degree for an entrepreneur. You are an
entrepreneur; you’re excited about this.
So [he] helped this guy basically build himself up, and actually go and
present the Last.fm. This is a really cool
thing because you’re right: You actually get cheerleaders out of the crowd, and
they just stumble into each other.
The concept I was telling you about before is we call it “enhancing
serendipity.” That’s a cool thing about being in an online community: You’re going
to stumble across people that can totally change your future.
Aaron Strout:
That is fascinating. I love that case study. I think more and more of those are happening
as people do meet online. In our sort of
pre-conversation, you did talk a little bit about a point that I think is a
good one to get across. You had
mentioned you came into the business thinking that you were going to manage
this community of – it wasn’t 35,000 at the time –
Jasmine Antonick:
Absolutely.
Aaron Strout:
– but what you’ve come to learn
and what you now are sort of espousing to other folks is that you really can’t manage
a community. It goes against the nature
of it. It’s using your words. It’s a living, breathing organism, and you
really need to work with the community.
Can you talk a little bit about that, and what you’ve found successful
in working with your community?
Jasmine Antonick: Absolutely.
I think – we’ve gone to a lot of conferences lately. [We’ve] been lucky
enough to speak at some and lucky enough to just be audience members, and to
kind of be sponges at others. You hear a
lot of people – The buzz around 2.0, and there’s a lot of corporations that
have been around for a long time and are very kind of hierarchal, and kind of
closed off organizations that still feel – like PR and marketing and business
development – “Communicate to your consumer. They will like it; they will buy
it.”
The fact is, they think, “If I have a blog or I create an online
community, I can manage this community and I can mange my message.” [Inaudible], just like they have for the past
50 years, as proper consumers should.
But the fact is that the culture is changing, and the more and more
people are getting involved online, the more and more they’re realizing that
they have a say.
One of the cool things that happens to people online, too is they
actually kind of go through a self-discovery period. They actually start to realize more and more
about themselves as they interact with other people online. I think what happened is we fell into the
same trap when we launched Cambrian House.
We thought, “We’re going to be a repository for ideas, where we’ll
invite people to join as members and we will manage this community. We will get their feedback on what ideas are
the best, and then we will tell them how to build it. We will break down the tasks. You will come to us and say, ‘I am a good
copywriter,’ so we will say, ‘Okay, you will write copy for the home page of
this next product that won IdeaWarz.’”
But –
Aaron Strout:
Litter did you know, right?
Jasmine Antonick:
– little did we know! What happens is as people create their
profiles, as they start falling in love with certain ideas, or submitting their
own idea, so they’re definitely passionate about it – as a kind of armchair
entrepreneur – is they don’t want to be managed. I think we really started – we learned that
fast, absolutely. They’re going through
a self-discovery mode. They want to
interact with each other. And in fact,
instead of us telling them what to do, thinking that will make it easy for them
if we say, “Look, here’s how to go through the process,” is … no! The one really cool thing: They give us the
most valuable feedback. They give us the
most valuable to-dos. The to-do list
that we gather from our community on a weekly basis is remarkable: “Clean up
this page. Make this copy cleaner
because we don’t quite understand it. I
believe in your royalty point model that you say it needs to be this, but we
figure that it needs to be managed this way.”
I think it’s the most valuable experience any company can ever have, to
actually have this type of open feedback from their crowd.
Whether or not they’re a software company, an online community like we are, all
the way up to Dell, who recently went through some [inaudible] times [inaudible]
power of a blog. That’s where we [inaudible],
because we truly thought we’d be able to manage it. But in fact, you don’t
manage a community. It totally is like
you and I said: It’s a living, breathing organism, and it does what it wants to
do. What you need to do is one, create a
crowd; two, give them the tools to interact with each other, to communicate, to
promote themselves, to learn, to reach out.
Create a very rich experience online, which to us now we figure is
[inaudible], but this is something that we learned as we went through. It’s the social networking fabric. Some places do it better than others.
If you give them all the tools, then you have to kind of let them
be. Now there are some times where you
have to say, “I cannot bow to this command from the community,” because as our
vision grows, that we just feel maybe won’t fit into a certain line of
development.
But this is an ongoing conversation, so we are constantly involved in a
two-way conversation with our community. We’re in the forums. They have our personal e-mail addresses. A lot of them have their instant messages us
from within the community, but they also have your IM, your Yahoo and your MSN
instant messenger. They’ll pop up and
say, “This is the experience I had,” or, “I found this idea. I think you guys should really take a look at
it and see if Cambrian House wants to have a personal investment.” They promote each other to us, and they come
up with – they’ll pat us on the back, and other times they’ll try and drag us
down because they’ll say, “You aren’t treating us well.” It’s a learning experience, and you have to
listen to them because if you don’t, you’re going to lose them.
Aaron Strout:
Right. Well, to that end, I think it is good if you
are responding, and that is the key ingredient to working with [them], is
making them feel like, “You know what?
That is a good idea, but we can’t necessarily do it because of X or it
doesn’t fit into our grand scheme.” I
think sometimes if they know that you’ve heard them, and you can respond to
that and sometimes even publicly, so you can say, “Look, this was a great idea,
and it just isn’t going to fit right now,” then it makes it a little –
Jasmine Antonick: Exactly.
Aaron Strout: – easier than, “I’m just going to ignore
you,” and then they go out and create terror on your message boards and your
blogs –
Jasmine Antonick:
Totally. I mean – exactly. The olden days of the “no comment” quote
doesn’t work now. Your members are far
more savvy than they used to be, and they do feel like they’re full-time
employees. Cambrian House is unique in
the fact we’ve totally said – We’ve gone through two rounds of angel investment
right now, and we have totally said to our community, when we’re raising money,
they’re more than welcome to jump in and actually become investors in the
community, but they don’t have to be.
They do feel like they’ve got a vested interest in our well-being,
because the better that we do, the better that they’ll do as well.
One really unique thing that we did, which actually happened, of course, after
we spoke and did the interview for We
Are Smarter Than Me, is we launched something called the Cambrian House
Co-op. We created a separate entity
called the Co-op so we would be able to share our equity and revenue with our
community, so 1 percent of our equity and revenue can now be shared with the
community. There’s a community board,
totally based of community members from Cambrian House. We’re having an annual general meeting in
September of this year to elect the actual proper board for 2008. Then, any equity that we have, if we ever,
down the road, decide to either be acquired or go public – but as well, any
revenue that we create as we start to grow our community and our website – 1
percent of that will be shared with community members, so they automatically
get a share.
As opposed to – a good example: I love Caterina Fake. I think she’s a brilliant community
evangelist. She was one of the
co-creators of Flickr. Now, Flickr sold to Yahoo. Now, the amazing
thing about an online community is that value comes absolutely from the people
involved. When Flickr sold for
$30 million – which is a great acquisition for them, and congratulations;
it’s phenomenal. I love Flickr. But the community members who helped build it
and make it a rich community, what they got was a photo-sharing and
photo-hosting service. They didn’t get
any of that value-add back.
Now, community members aren’t necessarily in it for the dollar. Neither are we, as founders of the Cambrian
House. But we thought it would be a
really neat experience to say, “Okay, not only can you give us feedback and act
as if you’re employees, because you truly do help us grow this business, why
don’t we also make it worth your time?
Your idea might launch and actually become commercially successful,
which is one point of value. You might
meet some amazing people on the community, which is another point of
value. But just in case, there’s also
this other thing here, too, which is we’ll actually share equity with you. You actually have a piece of the pie,” which
is totally unique in the Web 2.0 online community space. We’re trying it out. We’ll see how it goes.
Aaron Strout:
Well that’s great. You’ll have to keep us posted. With that said –
Jasmine Antonick:
I will.
Aaron Strout:
– I’m going to wrap up and be
respectful of your time and the audience’s time. Jasmine, this was a wonderful discussion. I think there are probably opportunities for
numerous other podcasts, because, as you mentioned at the beginning of the
conversation, you continue to evolve as a community business – we do the same
ourselves – so thank you.
We have Jasmine Antonick, who is the VP of communications at Cambrian
House. Thanks so much.
Jasmine Antonick:
Awesome. Thanks, Aaron.
Aaron Strout:
We appreciate you listening in to this series of the We Show podcasts. To find other podcasts like this, you can check out WeAreSmarter.org, Mzinga.com, and also iTunes under "We Are Smarter."
Thanks so much for joining us. We look forward to seeing you next week.
[End of audio]
Wed, Aug 08 2007
|