Mzinga : Enterprise Social Media & Learning Solutions
Learn More About:






Dave Wilkins

Dave Wilkins
Sr. Director of Social Learning Products
The Social Learner



Subscribe to the Dave Wilkins : Social Learner RSS Feed

Dave Wilkins : Social Learner

The Talent Gap and Community
I recently read an article in the WSJ about the “Talent Gap” and what to do about it (http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB118841695428712511-lMyQjAxMDE3ODE4NjQxMTY2Wj.html). In addition to the usual (and accurate) doom and gloom about the retirement of the Baby Boomers, they raised two other issues that I hadn’t previously considered:
  • The need for leadership and talent within *emerging markets* -- just consider the issues Mattel is facing right now with the “my Barbie tastes like lead” recall. First they faced a stateside PR nightmare when they had to issue a recall: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20592481/.  And now, they are facing a Chinese PR nightmare because they seemingly recalled too many toys and cast a less than favorable light on their Chinese suppliers: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20903731/. These supply chain issues are certainly not unique to Mattel, but in almost every case, they can be traced back to talent issues at some level.
  • *Expectation gaps* – Boomers, Gen X’ers and Millenials all have very different views of work/life balance and work itself. Many Boomers are looking for managers who remind them of themselves which means that they are failing to see and reward some of their most talented people. Couple with this with an overall labor shortage among managers, and dysfunctional turnover becomes an “all over but the crying” sort of reality. What talented Millenial is going to stay at an organization that can’t see their potential when another company does? Answer? None.
What this means is that the talent gap facing US companies is even more pronounced than the pure demographics convey. What’s interesting is that despite some pretty thoughtful recommendations to address these various gaps, the authors of this article don’t make the one recommendation that would address almost all of their identified issues: a business social network for the corporation:
  • *How do you transfer a massive amount of information from one generation of experts to the next?* You make it easy. You make it socially based. You store the interactions someplace where they can be searched. In short, you use a Community. The magnitude of the problem precludes formality or a quick fix. The solution needs to be something that can be started today and extend into the “retirement” of the Boomers. Community enables Boomers to share expertise easily and naturally, and at their convenience. Moreover, it directly appeals to the preferred interaction model of the Millenials and to a significant portion of the Gen X’er’s.
  • *How do manage and extend talent in emerging markets?* You enable your best managers to share their expertise and insight to newbies, irrespective of either’s physical location. You build a searchable knowledgebase over time that enables newbies to quickly find answers to common problems and tap the collective wisdom of the organization. You use Community to recruit and retain your best talent so that you continually grow your talent pool.
  • *How do you deal with expectation gaps between generations?* You flatten the traditional hierarchy so that the ideas and contributions of all employees are presented on an equal playing field. By dissociating the message from the messenger, companies have a better shot at identifying the best talent in the company and promoting from within. You allow participants to rank and rate each other’s ideas and even each other. Community provides a way to collectively identify and rank the best ideas and the talent in the organization in ways that avoid the typical “promote by narcissism” approach of most management teams.
While there are many other powerful uses for business social networking, it’s clear that talent management is an area that could be profoundly improved through the use of community. It’s equally clear that we may need to connect the dots for many of our peers in the HR community. If journalists who cover this space don’t see the obvious connections between talent management and community, issues like recruiting, retention, and learning / development may also suffer from a lack of “vision.” In short, we need to push this agenda, and we need to do it by drawing explicit connections between the features of a business social network and real business challenges. So what did I miss? How else can community help address the “talent gap?”

Sun, Sep 23 2007

Comments

Contact Dave
Call781.328.2818
Text603.566.6033
EmailDave@Mzinga.com
FriendFacebook
BlogThe Social Learner
BioAbout Dave Wilkins
SearchDave Wilkins

Don't forget us
Tell your friends
and colleagues

follow dwilkinsnh


Subscribe to the Recent Blogs RSS Feed

Recent Blogs

Nov 12Learning 2.0 and Workplace Communities
Oct 31Subject Matter Experts vs Peer-to-peer
Oct 30Social Learning Models
Oct 06Social Media and Community as EPSS
Sep 08New Hire Orientation in a 2.0 World
Aug 24Gartner's New Generation "V"
Aug 22UGC and the Learning Professional, prt 2
Aug 08UGC and Learning Professionals
Apr 05From Human Resources to Human WE-sources
Jan 28Q & A from our Learning 2.0 Webinar
Jan 24How to make a case for Learning 2.0
Jan 14Social Media, Politics and Election 2.0
Nov 28Attention Data -- The Rest of the Story
Nov 28Courseware = Thanksgiving Dinner
Nov 19Twitter – two wrongs do make a right…
Nov 08Notes from Day 2 of the Dev Learn show
Nov 07Social Learning & the Corporate D...
Oct 25Photosynth and Wisdom of the Crowd
Oct 18Formalizing Employee Networks
Sep 24Bad Title, Good Article
Sep 23The Talent Gap and Community
Sep 13What's wrong with Second Life?

  |     |     |     |     |     |     |  
phone • 888.MZINGA.8    fax • 781.930.5430   email • LearnMore@Mzinga.com   address • 154 Middlesex Turnpike, Burlington, MA 01803